{"id":431,"date":"2015-09-20T23:51:22","date_gmt":"2015-09-20T21:51:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/?page_id=431"},"modified":"2016-05-06T23:12:19","modified_gmt":"2016-05-06T21:12:19","slug":"the-bollywood-phenomenon-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/student-presentations\/the-bollywood-phenomenon-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Bollywood phenomenon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Valerie Mozaffari and Anna Mettner<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The growing appeal of Bollywood nowadays is a worldwide phenomenon. Due to it\u00b4s characteristics, which shall be identified in this blog entry briefly, it\u00b4s seen as the rising star of Indian film industry. The term `Bollywood\u00b4 itself was created by the English-language press in India in the late 1970\u00b4s and it is actually marking the Hindi film industry. Though it is kind of controverse because it ignores that feature films are produced in over twenty languages in India every year and that prolific film industries exist in a lot of other indian cities. Besides people suppose that because of the term\u00b4s similarity to America\u00b4s Hollywood, Bollywood tend to be a cheap copy of Hollywood but nevertheless the Bollywood film industry is at the same level or at least capable being at the same level of global dominance like Hollywood industry.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 328px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.stack.imgur.com\/gUVgY.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"318\" height=\"278\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Even already in 2001, 14 years ago, Bollywood industry was numerical superior to Hollywood, how does show this diagram.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>source:\u00a0https:\/\/movies.stackexchange.com\/questions\/5783\/minimum-or-maximum-movie-running-time-limits<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bollywoodization of the indian cinema<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The bollywoodization of the indian cinema is a phenomen, which especially has its origin in the liberalization of the indian market, which started with the replacement of India to the british colonial rule in the year 1947 and the following official independence of the indian market and their opening to foreign investors. Because of that, new goals of selling where raised, based on the new opportunities of the liberal indian market in the global capitalism. Among that, the export of indian entertainment products (music, movies etc&#8230;) started and with that, the export of indian movies to a foreign market with its own demand. The demand came from the new global audiences and the movies where not only anymore produced for India- there was a global audience, which wanted to consume indian movies by buying and watching them. Especially the global indian diaspora was interested in consuming products of the indian entertainment industry.<\/p>\n<p>But is there a difference between Bollywood films and indian films? Yes, Bollywood and indian films have their main differences in the spoken (or showed) language. Using Hindi, a trade language, understandable for the vast majority of indian population, as the main language in Bollywood films made the films appealing for most indian people. The sense of nationalism increased even more when Hindi became the national language in India. Another tool which lends to the feeling of a unified nation of India via Bollywood is the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=oWMIvW5T4WI\">electicism of music used in Hindi films<\/a><\/strong> \u2013 incorporating styles from various traditions f.e. from the north of India, religious, folk etc.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>[jwplayer mediaid=&#8221;403&#8243;]<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hum Aapke Hain Koun:\u00a0<\/strong>Is a romantic movie published in 1994 about a forbidden love and arranged marriage. Therefore the shown trailer, with music examples of the mentioned movie, is demonstrating perfectly the different types of music in Hindi films.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>What are the movies about? According the the former chairmen of the biggest enternainment group of India called ,,Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group\u2019\u2019 Amit Dhirubhai, the success of the movies are caused by the impression of their stories- their ends are mostly happy ends and the colours and the dance make the audience feel- good. The characteristics that came to define Bollywood gave it a quality of nationalism: representing India as a whole and not speaking about just one religion group, language, geographical area or caste. So basically the industry creates a dreamworld, suggesting that everything is posible and that problems can be resolved with emotions \u2013 especially love.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/img.soundtrackcollector.com\/cd\/large\/Devdas_CDF593.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"295\" \/><\/p>\n<p>source:\u00a0https:\/\/img.soundtrackcollector.com\/cd\/large\/Devdas_CDF593.jpg<\/p>\n<p>[jwplayer mediaid=&#8221;400&#8243;]<\/p>\n<p><strong>Devdas &#8211; Silsila Ya Chahat Ka<\/strong>: A romance published in 2002 about two young people who are forbidden to marry each other. Their frustration reflect the dancing and singing impacts &#8211; with a happy ending.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>[jwplayer mediaid=&#8221;401&#8243;]<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pretty Woman &#8211; Kal Ho Naa Ho: <\/strong>Another romance which has been published in 2003 and which is playing\u00a0in the U.S.- it\u2019s about a guy (the famous and most successfull indian actor Shah Rukh Khan), who flirts with a introvert girl, with whom he fell in love.<\/p>\n<p>Due to the treated topics, the used music etc. both movies definitely can be seen as pretty much exemplary for the Bollywood film industry.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Literature<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Anantharaman, Ganesh. (2008) Bollywood melodies. Penguin Books India. Mumbai. India.<\/p>\n<p>Ganti, Tejaswini. (2013) Bollywood: A Guidebook to popular Hindi Cinema. New York. Routledge<\/p>\n<p>Ganti, Tejaswini. (2012) Producing Bollywood: Inside the Contemporary Hindi Film Industry. Durhamn and London. Duke University Press<\/p>\n<p>Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2004) Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. Trentham Books.<\/p>\n<p>Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. (2010) Bollywoodization of the Indian Cinema: nationalism in a global arena. Inter- Asia Cultural Studies. Routledge.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hum Aapke Hain Koun &#8211; Theatrical Trailer &#8211; Madhur Dixit &amp; Salman Khan: https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=oWMIvW5T4WI<\/p>\n<p>Devdas &#8211; Silsila Ye Chahat Ka 720p w\/ English Subs: https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=4kjO3QuMnt8<\/p>\n<p>Pretty Woman &#8211; Kal Ho Naa Ho (2003) with English subtitles HQ:\u00a0https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=pwqSjTQzzx0<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Valerie Mozaffari and Anna Mettner Introduction The growing appeal of Bollywood nowadays is a worldwide phenomenon. Due to it\u00b4s characteristics, which shall be identified in this blog entry briefly, it\u00b4s seen as the rising star of Indian film industry. The term `Bollywood\u00b4 itself was created by the English-language press in India in the late 1970\u00b4s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2324,"featured_media":0,"parent":222,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-431","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/431","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2324"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=431"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/431\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":561,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/431\/revisions\/561"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/mediaanthro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}