Practicing and defining openness in the Social Sciences and Humanities: are concepts, practices, policies and infrastructure (mis)aligned?

Key takeaways from an online panel discussion with Dr. Simon Dumas Primbault, Prof. Dr. Lai Ma, and Dr. Samuel Moore

Authors: Maaike Duine and Maike Neufend

Within our project „Open Science Magnifiers”, we aim to develop discipline-specific indicators for several disciplines, one of which is the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). After initially concentrating on outputs, such as journal articles, book chapters, conference papers, blog posts, and open data, we encountered challenges due to a lack of available data sources. Therefore, we are currently interviewing SSH researchers on how they perceive and practice open research; what is important to them, at what stage in their career and why? Based on these interviews we aim to describe SSH Open Science Case Studies and shift the focus from monitoring open research outputs to monitoring open research processes. How can this be achieved?

„Practicing and defining openness in the Social Sciences and Humanities: are concepts, practices, policies and infrastructure (mis)aligned?“ weiterlesen

Bericht zur Diskussion „Open Access Monitoring – Chancen und Herausforderungen für die offene Wissenschaft“

Bericht zur Auftaktveranstaltung in der Reihe „Quo vadis offene Wissenschaft in Berlin und Brandenburg 2024/25“ von Lorenz Weinberg und Miriam Wildermuth (Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin)

Als Auftakt der Reihe „Quo vadis offene Wissenschaft in Berlin und Brandenburg 2024/25“ und im Rahmen der International Open Access Week fand am 21. Oktober die Online-Diskussionsveranstaltung „Open Access Monitoring – Chancen und Herausforderungen für die offene Wissenschaft“ statt.

„Bericht zur Diskussion „Open Access Monitoring – Chancen und Herausforderungen für die offene Wissenschaft““ weiterlesen