• I would restore the beginning of K 2418+ col. 4 differently

A iv 1. [……………………………………………………………] (the first line in this column is missing completely)
A iv 2. [………………] x [……………………………………….] (remains of a sign on the fragment AMT 76,5, which might actually be dent in the surface looking like a sign)
A iv 3. [………………] x [……………………………………. d]u (remains of a sign that might simply be dent in the surface of the fragment AMT 76,5; the sign DU is present in the very first line of the joining fragment AMT 82,2 col. iv)
_______________________________________________________________
A iv 4. [………………………………………………………….] a (the sign A occurs in the second line of the fragment AMT 82,2 col. iv; what preceded this sign in this line is now missing completely from the tablet; in this regard note the empty space on AMT 76,5 between the second fragmentary sign in A iv 3 and the next line in A iv 5 starting with ˹ku? ku? nam gi˺: there is enough space here to restore an extra missing line)
A iv 5. ˹ku^? ku^? nam gi˺ […………………………………………] si
A iv 6. pa bi nam gi ˹si si˺ […………………………………….. a]n^? (contra Schmidtchen’s identification of the last sign in this line being in subscript or superscript)
A iv 7. na aš₂ ka tab ba x [………………………………….TU₆ E]N₂

• line numbers in K 2418+ should be changed somewhat:
– either the restoration suggested above is to be followed, in which case two extra lines should be added in A iv 1 and A iv 4, and the apostrophes indicating missing lines after the line numbers should be deleted
– or the original line count is to be kept in place with some corrections: „76′ A iv 6’ff“ is not followed by „77′ A iv 8’f“, but by „77′ A iv 9’f“; from this place forward all line numbers were indicated incorrectly

• K 11829: physical join to K 2418+ iv 21-33 (18’/19′-20’/31′)(1)
21. ˹EN₂˺ [………… da]b ˹ka dab-dab-bi ka dab-dab-bi ka˺ [bad] ˹ka˺ bad ˹ka˺ b[ad^? …………] x
22. ka t[ar k]a tar ka tar-tar k[a igi^?-du₈^?] ˹TU₆ EN₂˺
_________________________________________________________________
23. EN₂ ud-da-ta ḫe₂-en-du₈-a lal₃ i₃-nun-na ka-ba ˹a˺-ra-an-be₂
24. ˹nig₂˺-sa₆-ga a-ra-ab-šum₂-ma-ta nam-tag-ga ˹aš₂˺ du₈-a TU₆ EN₂
_________________________________________________________________
25. i-na LAL₃ I₃.NUN.NA KA-šu₂ ta-kap-par₂ ˹EN₂˺ 3-šu₂ ŠID-nu
_________________________________________________________________
26. DIŠ NA mi-šit-ti TE TUKU-ši ^šimGUR₂.GUR₂ ^šimLI ^u2ak-tam GAZI˹^sar˺ ^šimMAN.DU ^šimGAM.MA
27. ^u2ap₂–ru-šu ZI₃ GIG ŠE₁₀ TU^musen.ME U₂.ḪI.A an-nu-ti₃ ˹ina˺ šur-šum-ma KAŠ
28. u KAŠ KALAG.GA SILA₁₁–aš ina ^uruduŠEN.TUR ŠEG₆–šal ina TUG₂ SUR-ri KA-˹šu₂˺ u TE-su LA₂
_________________________________________________________________
29. DIŠ NA mi-šit-ti GU₂ GIG ^šimGUR₂.GUR₂ ^šimLI ^šimMAN.DU ZI₃ ˹MUNU₆˺ DUH.ŠE.GIŠ.I₃ SUD₂
30. DIŠ-niš ḪI.ḪI ina I₃.NUN.NA u KAŠ.SAG ina ^uruduŠEN.TUR tara-bak ina TUG₂ ˹SUR˺-ri LA₂–ma TI
_________________________________________________________________
31. DIŠ NA mi-šit-ti MURUB₄ GIG a-tal₂–lu-kam₂ NU ZU MURUB₄.MEŠ-šu₂ ki-˹iṣ-ra˺ ik-ṣu-ra
32. ^gišbi-nu ^u2IN₆.UŠ₂ GI ŠUL.ḪI ^gišGIŠIMMAR.TUR ḪAD₂.A GAZ SIM K[I ZI₃.K]UM HI.HI ina GEŠTIN ŠUR
33. ina ^uruduŠEN.TUR ˹tara˺-bak ina KUŠ ˹SUR-ri˺ LA₂–ma U₄ 3.KAM₂ NU DU₈ ina U₄ ˹4˺ [……] x x GA[Z]

(1) Join identified by J. Scurlock; see the database http://www.fincke-cuneiform.com/nineveh/joins/index.htm.