ii

33. A_{ii 1} ^tug2NIG₂.DARA₂.ŠU.LAL₂ ^na4mu-ṣa ⌈^giš?⌉DIḪ₃ KAL bi-ni^!?[1] ina GU₂–šu₂ GAR-an KU.KU ⌈^na4SAG.KI⌉ ⌈KU.KU⌉ ^na4ZA.GIN₂ ina I₃ ŠEŠ₂–su

(ruling)

34. A_{ii 2f} ana ZI SAG.KI nu-⌈uḫ₂⌉-ḫi DUḪ.ŠE.GIŠ.I₃ SUMUN.MEŠ ^šimGUR₂.GUR₂ ^šimḪAB ⌈^šim⌉BULUḪ ⌈GAZI^sar⌉ ta-pa-aṣ / DIDA SIG₅ ZI₃.KUM ina KAŠ ŠEG₆.GA₂ tara-bak LAL[2]

(ruling)

35. A_{ii 4f} ana ZI ⌈SAG⌉.KI nu–uḫ₂–ḫi DUḪ.ŠE.GIŠ.I₃ ^šimGUR₂.GUR₂ ^šimBULUḪ DIŠ-niš GAZ[3] AL.U₂.SA[4] ZI₃.KUM / ina KAŠ DIŠ-niš ŠEG₆–šal ina TUG₂ SUR-re LAL-su-ma TI

(ruling)

36. A_{ii 6} DIŠ NA SA ⌈SAG⌉.KI-šu₂ GIG ^šimLI ^šimGUR₂.GUR₂ A.GAR.GAR MAŠ.DA₃ ZI₃ GIG DIŠ-niš ina KAŠ tara-bak LAL-ma TI-uṭ

(ruling)

37. A_{ii 7} GAZI^sar tur-ar₂ ZI₃ GIG it-ti-šu₂ ḪI.ḪI ina I₃ u KAŠ.SAG tara-bak LAL-ma TI-uṭ

(ruling)

38. A_{ii 8f} DIŠ LU₂ ⌈SA⌉ SAG.KI-šu₂ DAB-su-ma GU₇.MIN-šu₂ 10 KISAL ZI₃ GIG 10 KISAL ZI₃.KUM 10 KISAL ^šimGUR₂.GUR₂ / 10 KISAL ⌈GAZI⌉^sar 10 KISAL ZI₃ MUNU₅ 10 KISAL DUḪ.ŠE.GIŠ.I₃ TEŠ₂.BI ḪI.ḪI ina KAŠ ta-la₃-aš {x} SAG.KI-šu₂ LAL

(ruling)

39. A_{ii 10} a-na x (x) [nu]-⌈uḫ₂⌉-ḫi[5] ša₂ SA.ḪI.A ŠE.SA.A A.GAR.GAR MAŠ.DA₃ mal₂-ma-liš ḪI.ḪI ina KAŠ.SAG tara-bak LAL

(ruling)

40. A_{ii 11ff} [DIŠ (NA/LU2 SA^?) SAG.KI-šu₂^?] ⌈DAB⌉–su-ma GU₇–šu₂ u₃ i-ar₂-ru₃ / […] x [x] ina KAŠ ⌈NAG⌉ / [… KI/EN^?] ⌈i^?⌉-ar₂-ru₃ ŠU.BI.GEN₇.NAM

(ruling)

41. A_{ii 14f} [DIŠ (LU₂) …] x NINDA u KAŠ la i-maḫ-ḫar[6] LU₂ BI DINGIR-šu₂ iš-kun-šu₂ / […] x ⌈la^?⌉-bi-ri te-qeb^!?–ber-šu₂ A ina UGU TU₅

(ruling)

42. A_{ii 16} [x x x x x x] x LAL-id ⌈SIG₂⌉ ⌈^munusAŠ₂.GAR₃⌉ GIŠ₃.NU.ZU ^sig2ḪE₂.ME.DA NIGIN-mi KEŠ₂

(ruling)

43. A_{ii 17ff} [x x x x x MUNUS^?] ⌈pa⌉-ri-iš-tu₂[7] NU^!.NU SA MAŠ.DA₃ KI-šu₂–nu ta-pat-til / [x x x x x x] ⌈^na4⌉ZA.GIN₃ ^na4ZU₂ GE₆ E₃ ina SAG.KI-šu₂ KEŠ₂ / x[8] [x x x x x x] ŠIKA SILA.LIMMU₂ ni-kip-ta SUD₂ ina I₃.GIŠ^! ḪI.ḪI ŠEŠ₂–su

(ruling)

44. A_{ii 20f} DIŠ [NA SAG.KI ZAG]–⌈šu₂⌉ ⌈DAB-su-ma⌉ ⌈IGI⌉ ZAG-šu₂ IR₂ u₂-kal saḫ-le₂-e ZI₃ ŠE.SA.A / x [(x) LAGAB^?][9] ⌈MUNU₅⌉ DIŠ-niš ḪI.ḪI ina A GAZI^sar tara-bak SAG.KI-šu₂ LAL-ma TI-uṭ

(ruling)

45. A_{ii 22f} DIŠ NA^! SAG.KI GUB₃–šu₂ DAB-su-ma IGI GUB₃–šu₂ IR₂ u₂-kal saḫ-le₂-e ^u2ḪAR.ḪAR GAZ ⌈SIM⌉ / ina KAŠ AL.ŠEG₆.GA₂ tara-bak (blank) SAG.KI-šu₂ LAL-ma TI-⌈uṭ^?⌉[10]

(ruling)

46. A_{ii 24f} DIŠ NA SAG.KI.MIN-šu₂ ṣab-ta-šu₂-ma^! IGI.MIN-šu₂ u₂-kal-la saḫ-le₂-e ^u2ḪAR.ḪAR GAZI^sar / ZI₃ ŠE.SA.A BA.BA^!.ZA MUNU₅ DIŠ-niš ina ^dugUTUL₇ ina A GAZI^sar tara-bak SAG.KI.MIN-šu₂ SAR/GIR₁₁^!?[11]–ma TI-uṭ

B_{ii 1’f} ⌈DIŠ⌉ ⌈NA⌉ […] / ZI₃ ŠE.⌈SA⌉.[A …]

(ruling)

47. A_{ii 26f} DIŠ NA SAG.KI ZAG-šu₂ DAB-su-ma IGI ZAG-šu₂ MUD₂ u₂-kal saḫ-le₂-e ^u2ḪAR.ḪAR IM.BABBAR / ^gišKIŠI₁₆.ḪAB ZI₃ ŠE.SA.A BA.BA.ZA MUNU₅ DIŠ-niš GAZ SIM ina A GEŠTIN.NA tara-bak ŠU.BI.AŠ/DILI^?.AM₃

B_{ii 3’f} DIŠ NA ⌈SAG⌉.[KI …] / ^giš⌈KIŠI₁₆⌉.[ḪAB …]

C_0’-1’ […] / [^giš]⌈KIŠI₁₆^?⌉.[ḪAB …]

(ruling)

48. A_{ii 28f} [DIŠ] ⌈NA⌉ SAG.KI GUB₃–šu₂ DAB-su-ma IGI GUB₃–šu₂ MUD₂ u₂-kal [(x) ^u2]⌈KI⌉.KAL.ḪI.RI₂.IN / [^u2]⌈SU^?.AN^?⌉.DAR ^šimMUG DIŠ-niš GAZ ⌈SIM⌉ ⌈ina⌉ [(GA u) GEŠTIN(.NA)][12] ⌈tara⌉-bak MIN

B_{ii 5’f} DIŠ NA SAG.⌈KI⌉ ⌈GUB₃⌉–[šu₂ …] / ^u2SU.⌈AN.DAR⌉ […]

C_2’f [DIŠ] ⌈NA⌉ SAG.KI ⌈GUB₃⌉–[šu₂ …] / ⌈^u2⌉SU.AN.DAR.RA ⌈^šim⌉[MUG …]

(ruling)

49. A_{ii 30f} [DIŠ NA SAG.KI.MIN-šu₂ ṣab-ta-šu₂]–⌈ma^?⌉ ⌈IGI^?⌉.[MIN-šu₂ MUD₂ u₂-kal-la x x x (ZI₃) ŠE].⌈SA⌉.A / [DUḪ.ŠE.GIŠ.I₃ ša₂-bu–lu–te^? GAZ …] x

B_{ii 7’f} DIŠ NA SAG.KI.MIN-šu₂ ⌈ṣab⌉–[ta-šu₂-ma …] / DUḪ.ŠE.GIŠ.I₃ ša₂-bu-⌈lu⌉-[te^? …]

C_4’f [DIŠ] ⌈NA⌉ SAG.KI.MIN-šu₂ ṣab-ta-šu₂–ma ⌈IGI^?⌉.[MIN-šu₂ …] / [DUḪ].⌈ŠE⌉.GIŠ.⌈I₃⌉ ša₂-bu-lu-te GAZ […]

(ruling)

50. B_{ii 9’f} DIŠ NA SA SAG.KI ⌈ZAG⌉–[šu₂ ZI-ma IGI ZAG-šu₂^? …] / ^u2SI.SA₂ ZI₃ ⌈GIG⌉ […]

C_6’f [DIŠ NA SA SAG].⌈KI⌉ ⌈ZAG-šu₂⌉ ZI-ma IGI ⌈ZAG^?⌉–[šu₂ …] / [^u2SI.SA₂ ZI₃ GIG] ⌈^šim⌉BULUḪ x […]

(ruling)

51. B_{ii 11’f} DIŠ NA SA SAG.KI ⌈GUB₃⌉–[šu₂ ZI-ma IGI GUB₃–šu₂^? …] / ^u2SI.SA₂ […]

(ruling)

52. B_{ii 13’f} DIŠ NA SA SAG.KI ⌈ZAG⌉–[šu₂ ZI-ma IGI ZAG-šu₂ IR₂ u₂-kal saḫ-le₂-e AR₃/BIL^?–ti₃[13] ^u2ḪAR.ḪAR GAZI^sar][14] / ^u2EME-UR.GI₇ ⌈ina⌉ [A GAZI^sar tara-bak ZI₃ ŠE.SA.A ana IGI ta-šap-paḫ^? SAG.DU-su SAR-ab LAL-ma TI(-uṭ)]

(ruling)

53. B_{ii 15‘} DIŠ NA SA SAG.⌈KI⌉[15] [ZI(–ma) IGI GUB₃–šu₂ IR₂ u₂-kal (…) NIG₂.LAL MIN^?][16]

(ruling)

54. B_{ii 16‘f} DIŠ NA SA ⌈SAG⌉.[KI ZAG u GUB₃–šu₂ ZI-ma IGI.MIN-šu₂ ki-lal(–la)–an[17] IR₂ u₂-kal-la] / saḫ-le₂-⌈e⌉ [AR₃/BIL^?–ti₃[18] lu ina KAŠ lu ina GA (UZ₃) tara-bak SAG.DU-su SAR(-ab) LAL-ma TI(-uṭ)][19]

(ruling)

55. B_{ii 18’f} DIŠ NA x […] / LAL-⌈id^?⌉ […]

(ruling)

56. B_{ii 20‘} DIŠ ⌈NA⌉ […]

(ruling)

57. B_{ii 21‘} DIŠ […]

(gap of appr. 10 lines)[20]

58‘ A_{ii 55’ff}[21] ^gišŠUR.MIN₃ ⌈^giš⌉ x […] / ^gišar₂-gan-nu ^gišba-⌈ri-ra-tu₂⌉ [x x] x [x x x x x x x] / ŠURUN GU₄ A.GAR.GAR MAŠ.DA₃ DIŠ-niš ⌈GAZ⌉ [x ina^?] ⌈DIDA⌉ [x x x x x x] / ana IGI ta-šap-paḫ SAG.DU-su ⌈SAR⌉-ab LAL-ma ^u2IGI-lim ⌈^u2IGI-20⌉ x x (x) [x x x x] / ZI-aḫ ^na4SAG.KI ina ZAG-šu₂ KEŠ₂–su ^u2ar₂-zal-la ŠIKA GUL.GUL LU₂.⌈U₁₈.LU^?⌉ [x x (x)] / ni-kip-ta₅ NUMUN ^gišMA.NU ^u2DILI NUMUN ^gišbi-ni ^u2AŠ.TAL₂.TAL₂ DIŠ-niš te-pe-eṣ ina I₃.GIŠ^!(GAZI) ^gišEREN ḪI.⌈ḪI-ma^?⌉ / ŠEŠ₂–su bal-ṭu₂-su-nu ina DE₃ ^gišKIŠI₁₆ tu-qat-tar-šu₂ I₃ DU₁₀.GA SAG.KI.MIN-šu₂ EŠ-aš

(ruling)

59‘ A_{ii 62’ff} DIŠ NA SAG.KI ZAG-šu₂ GU₇–šu₂-ma IGI ZAG-šu₂ nap-ḫat u₃ IR₂ BAL-qi₂[22] ŠU.GIDIM.MA ša₂-ne₂–<e> ^diš₈-tar₂ / ana TI-šu₂ ^gišsi-ḫu ^gišar₂-ga-nu ^gišba–ri-ra-tu₂ 1 GIN₂ UḪ₂–^dID₂ ^u2IN₆.UŠ₂ / GI ŠUL.ḪI ina ZI₃.KUM ḪI.ḪI ina KAŠ tara-bak LAL : DIŠ KI.MIN šur-šum-mi ši-iq-qi₂[23] šur-šum-me A GEŠTIN.NA KALA.GA / šur-šum-mi KAŠ.SAG ZU₂.LUM.MA NI.TUK^ki 1 GIN₂ I₃.UDU ^šimGIG ina I₃.NUN SUD₂ te-qe₂

(ruling)

[1] Attia/Buisson (2003), 5 emend the uncertain passage to ^gišA bi-ni^!. Otherwise the position of the determinative GIŠ before the component A of the ingredient bīnu would be quite odd and at least the scribe wrote a clear KAL-sign. This might suggest, next to the emendation of Attia/Buisson, other emendations like <qi₂>-lip₂ or the uncommon spelling lip₂ for līpu/lipû “fat, tallow; marrow, pith”. Cf. also the possible reading lab-bi-ni, see Attia/Buisson (2003), 16.

[2] See also the much more elaborated parallel or variant BAM 9:62f (ina ZI₃.KUM ⌈DIDA₂⌉ […] / […A^?].MEŠ GAZI^sar ina KAŠ.MEŠ(corrupt for DIŠ-niš?) ŠEG₆–šal tara-bak LAL-ma ina-[eš]). Cf. similar BAM 11:20. These entries seem to have elements of both entries UGU 2:34 and 35.

[3] The parallel BAM 9:40 adds ILLU ^šimḪAB but replaces the following DIŠ-niš GAZ with GAZI^sar which might be a corrupt reading.

[4] Frequent by-form of AL.US₂.SA = šiqqu.

[5] Attia/Buisson (2003), 6 reads a-na [nu-uḫ₂]-ḫi but the traces after a-na suggest another sign than NU. Despites this, the sign UḪ₂ is visible.

[6] For this symptom cf. BAM 174 (always in connection with sufferings of ṣētu-heat). Most of the other attestations are connected to intestinal problems as well as demonic or divine induced afflictions.

[7] It is suggested by U. Steinert that the menopausal woman is the subject of the sentence.

[8] The traces might belong to a sign similar to BI or IŠ/SAḪAR.

[9] See for LAGAB in front of MUNU_5/6 the parallel BAM 9:15.

[10] Not noted in Attia/Buisson (2003), 6. The traces (a long vertical wedge whose top is damaged) might likewise belong to a purposeful erasure. Although, it looks in my opinion comparable to the form TI-uṭ used in the surrounding entries.

[11] Attia/Buisson (2003), 6/13 interprets SAR (not EZEN!) here as the unusual spelling GIR₁₁ translating “tu appliques” but one might likewise think of SAR = qatāru “to fumigate”.

[12] For restoration see the parallel BAM 3 iii 32.

[13] BAM 3 and BAM 35 seem to differ concerning the reading of BIL-ti₃ or AR₃–ti₃ in connection with saḫlû, cf. UGU 2:54 (with parallels in Attia/Buisson (2003), 7).

[14] For restoration see the parallel BAM 3 iii 20f.

[15] Attia/Buisson (2003), 7 reads DIŠ NA SA SAG.KI ⌈GUB₃⌉-[šu₂ …] but the actual tablet is broken richt within the sign KI.

[16] For restoration cf. the parallel BAM 3 iii 24.

[17] The reading for this word in the parallel BAM 3 iii 25 in Attia/Buisson (2003), 7 (ki-la₂-an) has to be corrected to ki-lal-an.

[18] See Fn. to UGU 2:52.

[19] The restoration follows more or less the parallel BAM 35 iv 1’-2 since it equals the previously used formular of UGU 2 the most whereas BAM 3 shows some deviations (cf. for this line saḫ-le₂-e BIL-ti₃ šum₄-ma ina KAŠ šum₄-ma ina GA UZ3 SAG.DU-su SAR LAL-ma [x (x)]).

[20] This approximation concerning the line numbers follows the reconstruction in Attia/Buisson (2003), 7 restored from the appr. 24 lines missing between ms. A1 (K. 2392+) and A2 (K. 2611) as well as the surplus of 13 lines given in ms. B after the break of A1.

[21] It is uncertain how much lines need to be restored before ms. A2 begins. If the overall structure of the symptom descriptions is still valid, the entry might have been concerned with symptoms of both sides of the patient’s temples as well as both of his eyes.

[22] The parallel in Sakikkû 4:30 has differently DE₃–qi₂.

[23] The parallel BAM 3 iii 10 has differently šur-šum-mi KAŠ but leaves out the KAŠ.SAG of the next line which suggests a possible corruption of the passage in BAM 3.