Since K. Simko worked a lot on this material (with A. Bacskay) I hope for comments and suggestions from this side. Since the CDLI-photo of Sm. 950, the only safe fragment of CRANIUM 4 (see preliminary transliteration), is partly hard to read and its copy in CT 23, pl. 50 differs to some degree better photos (or collations from the actual tablet) are in need.<\/p>\n
Here some notes and ideas on the distribution of CRANIUM 4 and 5 as well as possible fragments for which I hope the aforementioned authors might have some more elaborate ideas and suggestions:<\/p>\n
– according to B\u00e1cskay\/Simko, JMC forthcoming BAM 494(?), 495(?), 497-499(?) might belong likewise to UGU 5; for UGU 5 and ad\u012b<\/em>-section of the AMC cf. further BAM 33 (extract) and AO 11447 (extract, see Geller, JMC 10 (2007)); Sm 950 is unlikely to be a fragm. of BAM 494 due to the shape of the break at the respective position of col. i, although it is uncertain if BAM 494 (and similar texts) represents the continuation of UGU 4 or UGU 5<\/p>\n – the spacial distribution as well as the content of the fragments suggest: 1. (UGU 4?) a tablet on lesions and skin complaints on the head (beginning with Sm. 950 and maybe continuing with BAM 494 which notes again I3<\/sub> gi<\/sup>\u0161<\/sup>EREN syllabically I3<\/sub> gi<\/sup>\u0161<\/sup>e-re-ni<\/em> as in Sm. 950)[1]<\/a> and 2. (UGU 5?) another tablet whose later columns draw attention to the hair and similar complaints[2]<\/a> (BAM 498-499)<\/p>\n – but Sm. 950 does not fit the break of BAM 494 which would indicate, that at least two mss. of UGU 4 have been preserved<\/p>\n – further possible fragments: 70-7-8, 86 (AMT 52\/5, rim\u00fbtu<\/em> and \u0161immatu<\/em> of the body, dupl. K. 16421, maybe also belonging to witchcraft or Ghost induced illnesses?), K. 2471 (DI\u0160 NA SAG.DU-[su<\/em> …], maybe also gura<\/em>\u0161tu<\/em>\/gur<\/em>\u0101ru<\/em>?<\/sup>, cf. DI\u0160 NA I3<\/sub> la-ta-ki<\/em> \u0160E\u01602<\/sub>–ma<\/em> SAG.DU-su gu<\/em>-[…], so maybe BAM 494 col iv?), K. 10549 (S\u00cdG SAG.DU BABBAR u<\/em> x […]), K. 13505 + K. 16419 (DI\u0160 NA SAG.DU-su<\/em> bar […][3]<\/a>), BAM 34 (AO 7482, nA palaeography, according to K\u00f6cher maybe Niniveh, GIG PE\u0160(.GIG) = kur\u0101ru<\/em>)<\/p>\n [1]<\/a> Other similar fragments without mentioning the head explicitly: 495 (a<\/em>\u0161<\/em>\u00fb<\/em>), 497 (a<\/em>\u0161<\/em>\u00fb<\/em>), 500 (a<\/em>\u0161<\/em>\u00fb<\/em>).<\/p>\n [2]<\/a> Cf. the catchline to UGU 5 mentioning stinging pain in the middle of the head<\/p>\n [3]<\/a> See maybe bar<\/em>\u0161<\/em>u<\/em> \u201cpatchy\u201c (OB said of hair).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Since K. Simko worked a lot on this material (with A. Bacskay) I hope for comments and suggestions from this side. Since the CDLI-photo of Sm. 950, the only safe fragment of CRANIUM 4 (see preliminary transliteration), is partly hard to read and its copy in CT 23, pl. 50 differs to some degree better … \u201eOpen Discussion on CRANIUM 4 and 5\u201c<\/span> weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1870,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1870"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":189,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188\/revisions\/189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}