{"id":59,"date":"2018-10-22T15:14:08","date_gmt":"2018-10-22T13:14:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/?p=59"},"modified":"2018-12-22T13:46:18","modified_gmt":"2018-12-22T12:46:18","slug":"bam-480-preliminary-working-transliteration-col-iii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/2018\/10\/22\/bam-480-preliminary-working-transliteration-col-iii\/","title":{"rendered":"BAM 480 preliminary working-transliteration col. iii"},"content":{"rendered":"

iii<\/p>\n

96\u2018 Aiii 1<\/sub> DI\u0160 \u2308KI?<\/sup>\u2309.[MIN[1]<\/a> \u2026] DE3<\/sub> \u1e63ar-ba-te ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

97\u2018 Aiii 2<\/sub> \u2308DI\u0160?<\/sup>\u2309 [KI.MIN?<\/sup> \u2026] \u2308\u0161im<\/sup>\u2309GUR2<\/sub>.GUR2<\/sub> ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

98\u2019 Aiii 3<\/sub> [DI\u0160 KI.MIN?<\/sup> \u2026 ZI3<\/sub>].\u2308KUM\u2309 \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

99\u2019 Aiii 4<\/sub> \u2308DI\u0160?<\/sup>\u2309 [KI.MIN?<\/sup> \u2026] \u2308ZI3<\/sub>.KUM\u2309 \u1e2aI.\u2308HI!<\/sup>\u2309 ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

100\u2019 Aiii 5<\/sub> \u2308DI\u0160?<\/sup>\u2309 [KI.MIN?<\/sup> \u2026 ina<\/em> A GAZI]\u2308sar<\/sup>\u2309 SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL : DI\u0160 KI.MIN qi2<\/sub>-lip \u0161e-el-le-be2<\/sub>-nu<\/em> ina<\/em>!<\/sup> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

101\u2018 Aiii 6<\/sub> \u2308DI\u0160?<\/sup>\u2309 [KI.MIN?<\/sup> \u2026 DE3<\/sub>?<\/sup>] \u2308\u1e63ar<\/em>\u2309-ba-te ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

102\u2019 Aiii 7<\/sub> \u2308DI\u0160?<\/sup>\u2309 [KI.MIN?<\/sup> \u2026] (blank) ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

103\u2019 Aiii 8f<\/sub>\u00a0 \u2308DI\u0160<\/strong>\u2309 [NA UD.DA TAB-ma<\/em> SIG2<\/sub><\/strong>] \u2308SAG<\/strong>\u2309.DU-\u0161u2<\/sub> i-\u0161a\u1e2b-\u1e2bu-u\u1e2b<\/em> ZI SAG.KI TUK.TUK<\/strong> \/ 1?<\/sup> \u2308GIN2<\/sub>?<\/sup>\u2309 [U5<\/sub> ARGABmu\u0161en<\/sup> ina<\/em> I3<\/sub>.GI\u0160 SUD2<\/sub>][2]<\/a> \u2308SAG\u2309.DU-su<\/em> SAR-ab tu-ka\u1e633<\/sub>-\u1e63a<\/em>[3]<\/a> LAL-ma<\/em> UD 3.KAM2<\/sub> NU DU8<\/sub><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

104\u2019 Aiii 10ff<\/sub> \u2308DI\u0160\u2309 \u2308KI\u2309.[MIN 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> (…) gi\u0161<\/sup>EREN 10?<\/sup>] \u2308GIN2<\/sub>\u2309 ZI3<\/sub> gi\u0161<\/sup>\u0160UR.MIN3<\/sub> 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> gi\u0161<\/sup>MIN3<\/sub>.DU 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> \u0161im<\/sup>LI 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> \u0161im<\/sup>GUR2<\/sub>.GUR2<\/sub> \/ 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> \u2308GAZI\u2309[sar<\/sup> 10 GIN2<\/sub>] \u2308ZI3<\/sub>\u2309 \u2308GU2<\/sub>\u2309.GAL 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> GU2<\/sub>.TUR 10 GIN2<\/sub> BAR ZU2<\/sub>.LUM.MA 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZA3<\/sub>.\u1e2aI.LI \/ 10 GIN2<\/sub> \u2308DIDA\u2309 \u2308SIG5<\/sub>\u2309 10 GIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> MUNU5<\/sub> DI\u0160-ni\u0161<\/em> \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI ina<\/em> KA\u0160 SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> GUR-ma<\/em> \u1e2aAD2<\/sub>.A GAZ SIM \/ \u2308SAG\u2309-ka u2<\/sub>-kal ina<\/em> \u0160A3<\/sub> 1\/3 SILA3<\/sub> TI-qe2<\/sub> ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> SAR-ab<\/em> LAL-ma<\/em> KI.MIN<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

105\u2019 Aiii 14<\/sub> [DI\u0160] \u2308KI\u2309.MIN ZA3<\/sub>.\u1e2aI.LI AR3<\/sub>–ti3<\/sub><\/em> \u0161im<\/sup>GUR2<\/sub>.GUR2<\/sub> NAGA.SI DI\u0160-ni\u0161<\/em> SUD2<\/sub> ina<\/em> KA\u0160 SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> SAR-ab<\/em> KI.MIN<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

106\u2019 Aiii 15<\/sub> [DI\u0160 KI].\u2308MIN\u2309 \u0161im<\/sup>GUR2<\/sub>.GUR2<\/sub> \u0161im<\/sup>LI \u0161im.d<\/sup>NIN.URTA NUMUN u2<\/sup>AB2<\/sub>.DU\u1e2a KA A.AB.BA \u0161im<\/sup>\u0160E\u0160 DI\u0160-ni\u0161<\/em> SUD2<\/sub> ina<\/em> KA\u0160 SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> SAR-\u2308ab<\/em>\u2309 KI.MIN<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

107\u2019 Aiii 16<\/sub> [DI\u0160 KI.MIN] \u2308\u0161im<\/sup>\u2309GUR2<\/sub>.GUR2<\/sub> \u0161im<\/sup>LI ILLU \u0161im<\/sup>BULU\u1e2a ZU2<\/sub>.LUM I3<\/sub>.UDU ELLAG2<\/sub> UDU.NITA2<\/sub> DI\u0160-ni\u0161<\/em> SUD2<\/sub> ina<\/em> KU\u0160 SUR-re<\/em> SAR-ab<\/em> KI.MIN<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

108\u2019 Aiii 17f<\/sub> [DI\u0160 NA SAG<\/strong>].<\/strong>\u2308DU<\/strong>\u2309–su<\/em> UD.DA TAB-ma u<\/em><\/strong> SU-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> GU7<\/sub>–\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> SAG.DU-su nu-pu-u\u1e2b<\/em><\/strong> PA gi\u0161<\/sup>ME\u0160.MA2<\/sub>.GAN.NA \/ [\u1e2aAD2<\/sub>.DU GAZ] \u2308SIM\u2309 ZI3<\/sub> GU2<\/sub>.GAL ZI3<\/sub> GU2<\/sub>.TUR ZI3<\/sub> \u0161e<\/sup>IN.NU.\u1e2aA[4]<\/a> DI\u0160-ni\u0161 ina \u0161ur-\u0161um-mi<\/em> KA\u0160 SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> SAR-ab<\/em> KI.MIN<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

109\u2019 Aiii 19<\/sub> [(DI\u0160 KI.MIN) DU\u1e2a.\u0160E].\u2308GI\u0160?<\/sup>\u2309.I3<\/sub> \u1e2aAD2<\/sub>.A-ti<\/em> \u0161im<\/sup>GUR2<\/sub>.GUR2<\/sub> \u0161im<\/sup>LI ZI3<\/sub>.KUM ina \u0161ur-\u0161um-mi<\/em> KA\u0160 SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> SAR-ab<\/em> KI.MIN<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

110\u2019 Aiii 20<\/sub> DI\u0160 KI.MIN [(x x)] \u2308u2<\/sup>\u2309HAR.\u1e2aAR \u0161im<\/sup>GUR2<\/sub>.GUR2<\/sub> \u0161im<\/sup>LI ZI3<\/sub>.KUM ina<\/em> KA\u0160 SILA11<\/sub>-\u2308a\u0161<\/em>\u2309 \u2308SAR!?<\/sup>–ab<\/em><\/span>\u2309[5]<\/a> [x (x)]<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

111\u2019 Aiii 21<\/sub> DI\u0160 KI.MIN \u2308u2<\/sup>LAL?<\/sup>\u2309 \u2308\u1e2aAD2<\/sub>.A?<\/sup><\/span>\u2309[6]<\/a> {x<\/span>}[7]<\/a> ina<\/em> A SED SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> SAR-\u2308ab<\/em>\u2309 [KI.MIN]<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

112\u2019 Aiii 22ff<\/sub> DI\u0160 NA SAG.DU-su<\/em> KUM2<\/sub>–<\/strong>\u2308ma<\/em><\/strong>\u2309 \u2308SIG2<\/sub><\/strong>\u2309 SAG.DU-\u0161u2<\/sub> i-\u0161a\u1e2b-\u1e2bu-u\u1e2b<\/em><\/strong> ana<\/em> KUM2<\/sub> SAG.DU-[\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> ZI-\u1e2bi<\/em>?<\/sup>] \/ u<\/em> SIG2<\/sub> DU-ta5<\/sub><\/em> GUB-zi<\/em>[8]<\/a> \u2308u2?<\/sup>\u2309[ak<\/em>]-\u2308tam<\/em>\u2309 u2<\/sup>\u0161i-ma-\u1e2ba<\/em> U2<\/sub> BABBAR \u2308DI\u0160-ni\u0161<\/em>\u2309 \u2308SUD2<\/sub>\u2309 \u2308ina<\/em>\u2309 \u2308A\u2309 \u2308\u1e2aI.\u1e2aI\u2309 \u2308SAG.DU-su<\/em>\u2309 \u2308te-sir<\/em>\u2309 \/ UD 2.KAM2<\/sub> ina<\/em> SAG.DU-\u0161u2<\/sub> i-mit<\/span><\/em>-\u2308ti3<\/sub><\/em>?<\/sup><\/span>\u2309[9]<\/a> x (x) x \u2308SAG\u2309.DU-su<\/em> \u2308LU\u1e2a!<\/sup>\u2309-si<\/em> NUMUN gi\u0161<\/sup>bi-ni<\/em> u2<\/sup>kam2<\/sub>-ka-da<\/em> \/ u2<\/sup>NIG2<\/sub>.GAN2<\/sub>.GAN2<\/sub> u2<\/sup>NIG2<\/sub>.GIDRU \u0160IKA \u2308NUNUZ?<\/sup>\u2309 [GA.NU11<\/sub>]\u2308mu\u0161en?<\/sup>\u2309 DI\u0160-ni\u0161<\/em> SUD2<\/sub> ina<\/em> I3<\/sub> \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI SAG.DU-su<\/em> \u0160E\u01602<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

113\u2019 Aiii 26f<\/sub> EN2<\/sub> mun\u0161ub2<\/sub> al-dub2<\/sub>-\u2308ba\u2309 [(x)] munu\u0161ub2<\/sub> al-kala-ga \/ mun\u0161ub2<\/sub> al-ke\u01612<\/sub>?<\/sup>-da-ke\u01612<\/sub>?<\/sup>-\u2308da\u2309[10]<\/a> [(x)] mun\u0161ub2<\/sub> nig2<\/sub>-gub-ba TU6<\/sub> EN2<\/sub><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

114\u2019 Aiii 28<\/sub> KA.INIM.MA SIG2<\/sub> SAG.\u2308DU\u2309 [(x)] NIG2<\/sub>.GUB.BA KE\u01602<\/sub>?<\/sup>.DA.KAM2<\/sub><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

115\u2019 Aiii 29ff<\/sub> DU3<\/sub>.DU3<\/sub>.BI na4<\/sup>DU8<\/sub>.\u0160I.A na4<\/sup>GUG na4<\/sup>ZA.GIN3<\/sub> \u2308na4<\/sup>\u2309[NIR2<\/sub>] \u2308na4<\/sup>BABBAR.MIN5<\/sub>?<\/sup>\u2309 na4<\/sup>IGI.KU6<\/sub> na4<\/sup>\u0160UBA \/ na4<\/sup>\u0160UBA A2<\/sub>.ZI.DA na4<\/sup>\u0160UBA A2<\/sub>.GUB3<\/sub>.\u2308BU?<\/sup>\u2309 [na4<\/sup>KUR-nu<\/em> DAB] \u2308na4<\/sup>\u2309MU\u0160.GIR2<\/sub> na4<\/sup>A\u0160.GI3<\/sub>.GI3<\/sub> na4<\/sup>UGU.A\u0160.GI3<\/sub>.GI3<\/sub> \/ 13 ni-bi an-nu-ti ina<\/em> sig2<\/sup>\u1e2aE2<\/sub>.ME.DA E3<\/sub>-\u2308ak<\/em>\u2309 [ina<\/em> SIG2<\/sub> (x x)] \u2308KE\u01602<\/sub>?<\/sup>\u2309-ma<\/em> SIG2<\/sub> DU-tu2<\/sub><\/em>[11]<\/a> ik-kal-la<\/em><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

116\u2019 Aiii 32f<\/sub> EN2<\/sub> at-ta ba!?<\/sup>-ra-an-gi zi-ba-\u2308an\u2309-[x x x (x)][12]<\/a> \u2308zi\u2309-im-ba-ra uz-mi-ia-a\u0161 \/ pa-at-ri un-da-kur-ra \u1e2be2<\/sub>-\u2308en?<\/sup>-na?<\/sup>\u2309 \u2308\u1e2be2<\/sub>\u2309 [x] \u2308\u0161a2<\/sub>\/i?<\/sup>\u2309 TU6<\/sub> EN2<\/sub><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

117\u2019 Aiii 34f<\/sub> KID3<\/sub>.KID3<\/sub>.BI 7 \u1e2ba-ru-be2<\/sub>-e \u0161a2<\/sub><\/em> IM.\u2308SI.SA2<\/sub>\u2309 TI-qe2<\/sub><\/em> ina<\/em> DE3<\/sub> ur<\/em>-\u2308ba-te<\/em>\u2309 \u2308tur-ar2<\/sub><\/em>\u2309 ina<\/em> I3<\/sub> \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI EN2<\/sub> 7-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> \/ \u0160ID-nu<\/em> 3-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> \u0160E\u01602<\/sub>–su<\/em> 3-\u0161u2<\/sub> ta<\/em>-\u2308\u1e2bal-la<\/em>?<\/sup>–su<\/em>\u2309 e-nu-ma ta-\u1e2bal-la-\u1e63u-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> EN2<\/sub> 3-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> ana<\/em> \u2308UGU\u2309 \u2308SAG\u2309.DU-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> \u0160ID-\u2308nu<\/em>\u2309<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

118\u2019 Aiii 36f<\/sub> EN2<\/sub> I.BI.GI I.BI.\u2308GI?<\/sup>\u2309[13]<\/a> [\u1e2aE2<\/sub>.EN.ZALAG2<\/sub>?<\/sup>].\u2308GE\u2309 SAG.KI \u1e63i<\/em> SAG.KI \u1e63i<\/em> \u1e2aE2<\/sub>.EN.ZALAG2<\/sub>.GE SAG.KI i\u1e63<\/em>?<\/sup> SAG.KI i\u1e63<\/em>?<\/sup> \/ \u1e2aE2<\/sub>.EN.ZALAG2<\/sub>.\u2308GE\u2309 [\u0160E.ER.ZI?<\/sup> \u1e2aE2<\/sub>.EN.ZALAG2<\/sub>?<\/sup>].\u2308GE?<\/sup>\u2309[14]<\/a> MA.AL.LAL I.DI MU.RA.AN.GUB \u1e2aUL.BI \u1e2aUL.\u1e2aUL EN2<\/sub><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

119\u2019 Aiii 38f<\/sub> KID3<\/sub>.\u2308KID3<\/sub>\u2309.[BI x x x (x)] x \u2308SAG\u2309.DU IGIRA2<\/sub>mu\u0161en<\/sup> SAG.DU BURU5<\/sub>.\u1e2aABRUD.DA NITA2<\/sub> gi\u0161<\/sup>U4<\/sub>.\u1e2aI.IN gi\u0161<\/sup>GI\u0160IMMAR \/ x x [x x x x (x)] EN2<\/sub> 3-\u0161u2<\/sub> ana<\/em> \u0160A3<\/sub> \u0160ID-nu<\/em> E\u0160.ME\u0160-su-ma<\/em> SIG2<\/sub> DU-tu2<\/sub> ik-kal-la lu \u0161a2<\/sub><\/em> NITA2<\/sub> lu<\/em> [\u0161a2<\/sub><\/em> MUNUS?]<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

120\u2019 Aiii 40<\/sub> [EN2<\/sub>?<\/sup> …] \u2308\u0161u?<\/sup>\u2309-gi lil \u0161u-ge-e-ne\/de3<\/sub><\/span> \u0161u-gi<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

121\u2018 Aiii 41<\/sub> [KID3<\/sub>.KID3<\/sub>.BI 7?<\/sup> \u1e2ba-ru<\/em>]–<\/em>\u2308be2<\/sub><\/em>\u2309-e<\/em> \u0161a2<\/sub><\/em> IM.SI.SA2<\/sub> TI ina<\/em> DE3<\/sub> tur-ar2<\/sub> ina<\/em> I3<\/sub> gi\u0161<\/sup>\u0160UR.MIN3<\/sub> MUD2<\/sub> gi\u0161<\/sup>EREN \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI E\u0160.ME\u0160-su-ma<\/em> SI.SA2<\/sub>–im<\/em>[15]<\/a><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

122\u2018 Aiii 42ff<\/sub> [EN2<\/sub> <\/span>(MU.UL.LU.U)]<\/span>[16]<\/a> \u2308\u1e2aUL\u2309.A \u0161a2<\/sub><\/em> GAL2<\/sub>{x}-ma<\/em>\/NIG2<\/sub>.GAL2<\/sub>.LA!<\/sup>(MA)<\/span>[17]<\/a> DINGIR{x} \u1e63i-ir-ta<\/em> \/ [ma-ni-ir-ra-an]-ni<\/span>[18]<\/a> \u1e2ba-ba-re-e\u0161<\/em><\/span>[19]<\/a> ma-ni-ir-ra-an-ni \u1e2bal-\u1e2bal-la-ta<\/em> la gu gim\/DIM2<\/sub>?<\/sup>.MA TI.LA.\u0160E3<\/sub> \/ [(x) du-ru?<\/sup>]-\u2308na\u2309-a\u0161<\/span>?<\/span>[20]<\/a><\/sup> du-ru-na-a\u0161 \u1e2bu-ri-na-a\u1e2b mu-un-di(-)\u1e2bu-na(-)\u1e2ba(-)at-tu-uk<\/span> TU6<\/sub> EN2<\/sub><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

123\u2018 Aiii 45<\/sub> [KA.INIM].\u2308MA\u2309 SIG2<\/sub> KE\u01602<\/sub>.DA.KAM2<\/sub><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

124\u2019 Aiii 46f<\/sub> (both lines seem to be purposefully erased)<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

125\u2019 Aiii 48<\/sub> DI\u0160 NA SIG2<\/sub> TE.ME\u0160-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em><\/strong> \u2308ma-gal<\/em><\/strong>\u2309 i-\u0161a\u1e2b-\u1e2bu-u\u1e2b<\/em> NA BI DINGIR-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> d<\/sup>i\u01618<\/sub>-tar3<\/sub>-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> KI-\u0161u2<\/sub> ze-nu-u<\/em><\/strong>[21]<\/a><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

126\u2019 Aiii 49ff<\/sub> KID3<\/sub>.KID3<\/sub>.BI ana<\/em> IGI MUL ma\u1e2b<\/em>-\u2308re<\/em>\u2309-e<\/em> KE\u0160DA KE\u01602<\/sub> ZU2<\/sub>.LUM.MA zi3<\/sup>E\u0160A DUB-aq<\/em> NINDA.I3<\/sub>.DE2<\/sub>.A LAL3<\/sub> I3<\/sub>.\u2308NUN.NA\u2309 \u2308GAR\u2309-an<\/em> \/ udu<\/sup>SISKUR DU3<\/sub>–u\u0161<\/em> uzu<\/sup>ZAG uzu<\/sup>\u2308ME\u2309.[ZE2<\/sub>] \u2308uzu<\/sup>\u2309KA.NE[22]<\/a> tu-\u1e6da\u1e2b-\u1e2ba<\/em> KA\u0160 BAL-qi2<\/sub><\/em> GI\u0160.GAN2<\/sub><\/span>?<\/span>[23]<\/a><\/sup> gi\u0161<\/sup>\u2308MA2<\/sub>.ERE\u0160e\u0161<\/sup>\u2309.MA2<\/sub>–le-e<\/em> \/ U5<\/sub> ARGABmu\u0161en<\/sup> u2<\/sup>IGI-20 \u2308u2?<\/sup>\u0160E10<\/sub>?<\/sup><\/span>\u2309[24]<\/a> \u2308MA2<\/sub>\u2309.LA\u1e2a5<\/sub> KI I3<\/sub> \u2308\u1e2aI.\u1e2aI\u2309 ina<\/em> \u2308IGI\u2309 MUL GAR-an<\/em> EN2<\/sub> an-ni-ta5<\/sub><\/em> 3-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> \u0160ID-nu<\/em><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

127\u2019 Aiii 52ff<\/sub> at-ta<\/em> MUL mu-nam-mir<\/em> x x x x \u2308\u0160UR?<\/sup>\u2309 ina<\/em> \u2308IGI?<\/sup><\/span>\u2309 qe2<\/sub>-reb<\/em> AN-e \u1e2ba-i\u1e6d<\/em> UB.ME\u0160 \/ ana-ku<\/em> NENNI A NENNI ina<\/em> GE6<\/sub> an-ne2<\/sub><\/em>-\u2308e<\/em>\u2309 IGI-ka kam2<\/sub>-sa-ku di-ni di-in<\/em> E\u0160.BAR-a-a<\/em> KUD-us<\/em> \/ U2<\/sub>.\u1e2aI.A \u0160E\u0160.ME\u0160 lip-si<\/em>-\u2308su<\/em>!<\/sup>\u2309 lum-ni<\/em> A2<\/sub>.GU2<\/sub>.ZI.GA u4<\/sub>-ma<\/em>[25]<\/a> TE.ME\u0160-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> ta-kar<\/em><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

128\u2019 Aiii 55<\/sub> DI\u0160 KI.MIN GI\u0160.GAN2<\/sub>?[26]<\/a><\/sup> gi\u0161<\/sup>LU2<\/sub>–a-nu<\/em> u2<\/sup>\u2308eli<\/em>\u2309-kul-la<\/em> u2<\/sup>kur-ka-na-a \u0161a2<\/sub><\/em> \u2308KUR\u2309 \u2308gi\u0161<\/sup>\u2309[27]<\/a> x x x x \u2308SIG2<\/sub>?<\/sup>\u2309 \u2308munu\u0161<\/sup>A\u01602<\/sub>.GAR3<\/sub>?<\/sup>\u2309 GI\u01603<\/sub>.NU.ZU ina<\/em> GU2<\/sub>–\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> GAR-an<\/em><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

129\u2019 Aiii 56<\/sub> 6 KA.INIM.\u2308MA\u2309 SIG2<\/sub> KE\u01602<\/sub>.DA.KAM<\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

130\u2019 Aiii 57ff<\/sub> DI\u0160 NA UGU-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> A<\/strong> \u2308u2<\/sub>-kal<\/em><\/strong>\u2309 \u0160U.SI-ka<\/em> GAL-ti a-\u0161ar<\/em> A.ME\u0160 u2<\/sub>-kal-lu<\/em> TAG.TAG-at \u0161um-ma<\/em> uzu<\/sup>GI\u0160-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em>[28]<\/a> \/ be2<\/sub>-\u02be-<\/em>\u2308\u0161at<\/em>?<\/sup>\u2309 [A(.ME\u0160 \u0161a2<\/sub><\/em>)[29]<\/a> gul<\/em>]-\u2308gul<\/em>\u2309-li-\u0161u2<\/sub> it-tar-du<\/em> BAD-ma gul-gul-la-\u0161u2<\/sub> te-ser-rim<\/em>[30]<\/a> A \u0161a gul-gul-li-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> \/ \u2308tu<\/em>\u2309-[\u0161e-lam-ma<\/em><\/span>?<\/span>[31]<\/a><\/sup> TUG2<\/sub>?<\/sup> SIG?<\/sup> A?<\/sup>] \u2308LU\u1e2a\u2309-si<\/em> I3<\/sub>.GI\u0160 SUD ana<\/em> UGU GIG GAR-an<\/em> KU.KU GI\u0160.KIN2<\/sub> ZI3<\/sub> BA\u1e2aAR2<\/sub> SUD2<\/sub> ana<\/em> UGU GIG \/ [MAR?[32]<\/a><\/sup> UD x.KAM2<\/sub> LAL DU8<\/sub>]-\u2308ma<\/em>\u2309 TUG2<\/sub> SIG!?<\/sup> A LU\u1e2a-si<\/em> I3<\/sub>.GI\u0160 SUD ana<\/em> UGU GIG GAR-an<\/em> tug2<\/sup>na-al-ti-ip-ti<\/em><\/span>[33]<\/a> \/ [… UD] 2+x.KAM2<\/sub> LAL DU8<\/sub>–ma<\/em> TUG2<\/sub> SIG!?<\/sup> A LU\u1e2a-si<\/em> I3<\/sub>.GI\u0160 SUD ana<\/em> UGU GIG GAR-an<\/em> \/ [x x x (x)] \u2308ti?<\/sup>\u2309 GAZIsar<\/sup> BIL2<\/sub>?<\/sup>–ti<\/em> KI ZI3<\/sub> \u0160E.SA.A \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI ana<\/em> UGU GIG MAR UD 1.KAM2<\/sub> LAL DU8<\/sub>–ma<\/em> \/ [x x (x)] \u2308\u0161im<\/sup>\u2309LI GAZ KI ZI3<\/sub>.KUM \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI ina<\/em> A GAZIsar<\/sup> SILA11<\/sub>–a\u0161<\/em> LAL IGI GIG tu<\/em>–gal-lab<\/em> EN TI.LA LAL2<\/sub> \/ x [(x)] x bad-ma<\/em><\/span>[34]<\/a> \u0161um-ma<\/em> uzu<\/sup>GI\u0160-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> la<\/em> be2<\/sub>-\u02be-\u0161at ana li-mit<\/em> SAG.DU-\u0161u2<\/sub><\/em> KUM2<\/sub>\/DE3<\/sub><\/span> NA4<\/sub>.ME\u0160[35]<\/a> GAR-an<\/em><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

131\u2019 Aiii 65ff<\/sub> EN2<\/sub> \u2308ur-ba<\/em>\u2309-tu4<\/sub> ur-ba-tu4<\/sub> ur-ba-tu4<\/sub> sa-am-tu4<\/sub><\/em> ZI-am-ma ur-pa-ta<\/em> SA5<\/sub> ik-tum3<\/sub><\/em> IM.\u0160EG3<\/sub> SA5<\/sub> \/ ZI-\u2308ma<\/em>\u2309 KI-ta5<\/sub><\/em> SA5<\/sub>–tu4<\/sub> ir-\u1e2bu<\/em> A.ZI.GA SA5<\/sub> ZI-ma<\/em> ID2<\/sub> SA5<\/sub>–tu4<\/sub> im-la<\/em> lu2<\/sup>ENGUR SA5<\/sub> \/ gi\u0161<\/sup>\u2308MAR\u2309 SA5<\/sub> gi\u0161<\/sup>DUSU SA5<\/sub> IL2<\/sub>–\u0161i<\/em>-\u2308ma<\/em>\u2309 A.ME\u0160 SA5<\/sub>.ME\u0160 li-is-kir<\/em> gi\u0161<\/sup>IG-ma<\/em> SA5<\/sub> gi\u0161<\/sup>SAG.KUL-mi<\/em> SA5<\/sub> \/ \u2308KA2<\/sub>\u2309-\u0161u2<\/sub>-nu it<\/em>!<\/sup>–tu man-nu-um-ma \u0161a2<\/sub> i-pe-et-ta-ku-nu-\u0161i<\/em>[36]<\/a> i-ri-i\u0161 ma-ra i-ri-i\u0161 ma-ra<\/em> TU6<\/sub> EN2<\/sub>[37]<\/a><\/p>\n

(ruling)<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> Simko argues that the first sign might better fit A or a compound with A like ILLU, skipping the introductory KI.MIN, done so in ms. A col. i.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> For the reconstruction cf. the parallels given in Worthington (2005), 11 (BAM 3 ii 28, BAM 9:24 and Jastrow obv 9).<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 11 as well as Scurlock (2014), 424 read mistakenly tu-ka<\/em>\u1e63<\/em>–<\/em>\u1e63<\/em>a<\/em> instead of the correct tu-ka<\/em>\u1e63<\/em>3<\/sub><\/em>(GAZ)-\u1e63<\/em>a<\/em>.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Suggestion Simko noting that the surrounding ingredients are all flour. Although, I would not exclude DABIN IN.NU.\u1e2aA entirely since DABIN is also a kind of rough flour. Since the logographic spelling is more often supplemented by the determinative \u0160E we prefer ZI3<\/sub> \u0161e<\/sup>IN.NU.\u1e2aA.<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 12 as well as Scurlock (2014), 425 read SILA11<\/sub>–a<\/em>\u0161<\/em> \u2308SAR-ab<\/em>\u2309 but the traces suggest rather \u2308ina<\/em> KU\u0160\u2309 x x (cf. A iii 16 for comparison). However, the following sign traces are problematic since they do not look like the then expected SUR-re<\/em>.<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> Contra Worthington (2005), 12 and Scurlock (2014), 425 this passage is actually damaged which has not been noted by both authors.<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 12 restores \u2308\u1e2aAD2<\/sub>.A.ME\u0160\u2309 whereas Scurlock (2014), 425 wants to read \u2308SUD2<\/sub>\u2309.<\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> Commentary K. Simko: (…) [R]egarding the phrases SIG2\u00a0<\/sub>DU-ta<\/em>5\u00a0<\/sub>GUB-zi<\/em>, mun\u0161ub2\u00a0<\/sub>nig2<\/sub>-gub-ba and SIG2\u00a0<\/sub>SAG.DU NIG2<\/sub>.GUB.BA: in its third column, CRANIUM 1 moves on to the hair whose loss is expressed in BAM 480 iii 23 with the phrase SIG2\u00a0<\/sub>DU-ta<\/em>5<\/sub>. As the syllabic writing in the related passage BAM 497 ii 3\u2019 \/\/ BAM 499 i 20\u2019 demonstrates, this phrase is \u0161\u0101rtu aliktu\u00a0<\/em>in Akkadian. Now, the question is how to understand the other verb GUB = uzuzzu\u00a0<\/em>that pops up three times in the lines BAM 480 iii 23, 27 and 28. The first time it is certainly an infinitive constructed with the preposition ana\u00a0<\/em>to describe the purpose of the procedure, which is to make the hair stop falling (lit. \u201cin order to make the going hair stay\u201d); a similar construction can be found in BAM 499 ii 10\u2019, this time with the preposition adi<\/em>:\u00a0a-di\u00a0<\/em>SIG2<\/sub>\u2013\u0161a<\/em>2\u00a0<\/sub>GUB-zu\u00a0<\/em>NU DU8<\/sub>. Far more problematic are the other two attestations in BAM 480 iii 27 and 28, transliterated both by Worthington and Scurlock as nig2<\/sub>-gub-ba \/ NIG2<\/sub>.GUB.BA. As for interpretations, Worthington seems to suggest two contradicting translations of the verb GUB, the first one being \u201ccause (the falling hair) to remain attached\u201d (infinitive construction in BAM 480 iii 23), and the second \u201cfallen (head-hair)\u201d (nig2<\/sub>-gub-ba \/ NIG2<\/sub>.GUB.BA in BAM 480 iii 27 and 28). Scurlock\u2019s translation, on the other hand, is consistent in the case of all three instances: \u201cto make (the hair that is going) stand firm\u201d (infinitive construction in BAM 480 iii 23), \u201c(hair) which stands firm\u201d (nig2<\/sub>-gub-ba in BAM 480 iii 27) and \u201cto make (the hair of the head) stand firm\u201d (NIG2<\/sub>.GUB.BA in BAM 480 iii 28). The problem that arises from such an understanding is that nig2<\/sub>-gub-ba \/ NIG2<\/sub>.GUB.BA is neither a verb nor a verbal adjective. If anything, it is a nominal form created by the combination of nig2\u00a0<\/sub>and the subordinate construction gub-ba. This is hardly the case, however. The rendering of this difficult form should rather be mun\u0161ub2<\/sub> nig2<\/sub> gub-ba \u201cthe hair which stands firm\u201d in Sumerian context (Sumerian incantation in BAM 480 iii 27) and SIG2\u00a0<\/sub>SAG.DU \u0161a<\/em>2\u00a0<\/sub>GUB.BA KE\u01602<\/sub>.DA.KAM2\u00a0<\/sub>\u201c(wording of the incantation to) bind the head-hair which stands firm\u201d in Akkadian context (Akkadian rubric in BAM 480 iii 28). An interesting alternative to the latter description can be found in the parallel passage OECT 11 71 obv. 8\u2019, which says SIG2\u00a0<\/sub>SAG.DU \u0161a<\/em>2\u00a0<\/sub>DU \u0160U.DU8<\/sub>.A.KA[M2<\/sub>] \u201c(wording of the incantations to) hold back the head-hair, which is falling out\u201d (not NIG2<\/sub>.GUB \u0160U.DU8<\/sub>.A.KAM2\u00a0<\/sub>as suggested by Scurlock in Sourcebook p. 335 n. 96).<\/p>\n

[9]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 12 following a suggestion of Stol (cf. ibid. 27). The sign form is problematic since it differs for example from DIM used in A i 6 concerning the last two horizontal wedges. The whole sign looks rather like a slightly damaged neo-Assyrian UB or a similar sign.<\/p>\n

[10]<\/a> Most likely Scurlock (2014) might be right in reading SAR as KE\u0160DA\/KE\u01603<\/sub> \u201cto bind\u201d and not like Worthington (2005) as MU2<\/sub> \u201cto (let) grow\u201d considering the ritualistic treatment in the following instruction as well as the last phrase of this instruction \u201c… and the falling out hair will be withhold\u201d which underlines the focus of the treatment regarding falling out hair that should be prevented from doing so. Following Simko\u2019s suggestion, this has to be seen as a single verb with reduplicated stem for intensity or plurality of action (the reduplicated form of MU2<\/sub> would be al-mu2<\/sub>-mu2<\/sub>).<\/p>\n

[11]<\/a> For the syllabic reading SIG2<\/sub> a-lik-tu2<\/sub><\/em> \u201cfalling out hair (will be withhold)\u201d cf. AMT 3\/2:19. Scurlock\u2019s reading SIG2<\/sub> DU-ta5<\/sub> is probably wrong since ikkall<\/em>\u0101<\/em> is a N-stem (passive) of kal\u00fb<\/em> \u201cto hold back\u201d so the subject should be most likely the hair.<\/p>\n

[12]<\/a> Scurlock (2014), 315 restores the whole incantation: at-ta ba-ra-an-gi<\/em> zi-ba-an<\/em>-[(gi<\/em> : ba-te-gi-ra<\/em>)] zi-im-ba-ra<\/em> uz-mi-ia-a<\/em>\u0161<\/em> \/ pa-at-ri un-da-kur-ra <\/em>\u1e2b<\/em>e2<\/sub>-e<\/em>[n-n<\/em>]a<\/em> \u1e2b<\/em>[(e2<\/sub>-min na-pa-ri<\/em>)-\u0161<\/em>]a2<\/sub><\/em> following the partly parallel OECT 11 71 obv. 9\u2018-10\u2018.<\/p>\n

[13]<\/a> Scurlock (2014), 315 restores I.BI.G[I(M \u2026)] but the traces look different from either GI or GIM. Simko suggests to stay with Scurlocks reading but I am still hesitant since there seems to be a Winkelhaken-like wedge directly at the beginning of the damaged sign that is following \u2308BI\u2309.<\/p>\n

[14]<\/a> For the restoration see Scurlock (2014), 315 following the partly parallel OECT 11 71 obv 11\u2018-13\u2018. The generally presumed parallel AMT 76\/6:4\u2019-11\u2019 is highly uncertain as such.<\/p>\n

[15]<\/a> The reading SI.SA2<\/sub>–\u0161<\/em>ar5<\/sub><\/em> (for ass. e<\/em>\u0161\u0161<\/em>ar<\/em> = bab. e<\/em>\u0161\u0161<\/em>ir<\/em>; or maybe i<\/em>\u0161\u0101<\/em>r<\/em>?<\/sup>) in Worthington (2005), 12 instead of SI.SA2<\/sub>–im<\/em> (= i<\/em>\u0161<\/em>allim<\/em>) is unnecessary.<\/p>\n

[16]<\/a> For the restoration see Scurlock (2014), 315 following the partly parallel OECT 11 71 obv 14\u2018-16\u2018. (Remarks following K. Simko:) 1. The last U (in OECT 11, 71) has been left out by Scurlock. 2. ha-ba-re-e\u0161<\/em>: the interpretation \u201enoisily\u201c would make much sense if the word that follows were indeed hal-hal-la-ta<\/em> \u201ekettle-drum\u201c. This does not seem to be the case, however (s. below). What contradicts the reading ha-ba-re-e\u0161<\/em> is the fact, furthermore, that OECT 11 71 divides the sign sequence in two consecutive lines, with \u201eha\u201c and probably \u201eba\u201c occurring at the end of l. 14\u2032, while \u201ere\u201c and \u201ee\u0161\u201c at the beginning of l. 15\u2032. 3. hal-hal-la-ta<\/em>: note the Glossenkeil in OECT 11 71 obv. 15\u2032, separating hal-hal from la-ta. 4. [(x) du-ru?<\/sup>]-\u02f9na\u02fa-a\u0161?<\/sup> du-ru-na-a\u0161: the repetition does not seem possible, since the parallel passage in OECT 11 71 obv. 16\u2032 contains the remains of what appears to be signs like MA U BA and probably NA right before the sign sequence du-ru-na-a\u0161. Based on the Oxford text, an alternative rendering of the passage might be something like [x x ma u-ba-n]a-a\u0161 du-ru-na-a\u0161. (Continuation E. Schmidtchen): Albeit the observations of Simko are transparent I would be cautious following OECT 11, 71 to close. Cf. for this the parallels of OECT 11, 71 to UGU 3 which show some noticeable textual corruptions (especially the incantations OECT 11, 71 obv 17\u2019-35\u2019 = UGU 3 ii-iii).<\/p>\n

[17]<\/a> Suggestion by U. Steinert.<\/p>\n

[18]<\/a> For the restoration see Scurlock (2014), 315 following the partly parallel OECT 11 71 obv 14\u2018-16\u2018.<\/p>\n

[19]<\/a> If \u1e2b<\/em>al<\/em>\u1e2b<\/em>allatu<\/em> hast o be taken seriously as \u201ckettle-drum\u201d \u1e2b<\/em>ab<\/em>\u0101<\/em>re<\/em>\u0161<\/em> \u201cwith much noise; noisily\u201d might be a good qualification for phenomena in connection with the drum.<\/p>\n

[20]<\/a> Worthington as well as Scurlock read WI\/PI but the last horizontal wedge is slightly separated which suggests rather the reading na-a\u0161 (cf. the same two signs later). The here preferred restoration follows a suggestion of U. Steinert.<\/p>\n

[21]<\/a> Sounds rather like a diagnostic or physiognomic omen (cf. the apodosis which is not exceptional but unusual for a diagnostic omen) then a symptom description.<\/p>\n

[22]<\/a> Note Simko: uzu<\/sup>ZAG (imittu<\/em>) uzu<\/sup>\u02f9ME\u02fa.[HE2<\/sub>] (him\u1e63u<\/em>)\u00a0\u02f9uzu<\/sup>\u02faKA.NE (\u0161um\u00fb<\/em>); these three types of meat occur consistently together in the type of rituals presented by CRANIUM 1; see for instance the respective places in Maul Zukunftsbew\u00e4ltigung pp. 130 l. 12, 133 l. 79, 294 ll. 12f. etc.<\/p>\n

[23]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 13 (cf. the corrections in Worthington (2007), 43) reads gi<\/sup>\u0161<\/sup>GAN2<\/sub> but the sign shows clearly two vertical small wedges in the middle instead of three which would be needed in the case of GAN2<\/sub>. Otherwise, the reading gi<\/sup>\u0161<\/sup>\u0160ITA is unsatisfactory as well. Simko remarks concerning this problem: one should look at the parallels AMT 91\/1 rev. 5 \/\/ AMT 92\/4 rev. 10\u2032, where the sign is written with two (AMT 92\/4 rev. 10\u2032), as well as with three vertical wedges (AMT 91\/1 rev. 5). Based on this attestation, I would not exclude the possibility that sometimes GAN2<\/sub> contains only two verticals. As Worthington (JMC 5 p. 28) suggested, GI\u0160.GAN2<\/sub> might be an abbreviated form for ki\u0161kan\u00fb<\/em>. For gi\u0161<\/sup>\u0160ITA see Borger MZl p. 327, where it is noted that this form is not attested in monolingual Akkadian texts.<\/p>\n

[24]<\/a> Simko argues that \u0160E10<\/sub> MA2<\/sub>.LA\u1e2a5<\/sub> is seldom written with determinative U2<\/sub> (usually in plant-lists only) and want therefore restore \u2308u2<\/sup>\u2309[IGI-lim<\/em>] within the break. Next to the problem of space, which is indeed not much for three signs, the order im<\/em>\u1e2b<\/em>ur-e<\/em>\u0161<\/em>r<\/em>\u0101<\/em> im<\/em>\u1e2b<\/em>ur-l<\/em>\u012b<\/em>m<\/em> is rather uncommon and usually written in reverse order.<\/p>\n

[25]<\/a> Following the interpretation of Scurlock (2014), 316. Worthington (2005), 13 interprets the ambiguous form as BABBAR-ma<\/em> \u201c(When) the morning is bright …\u201d.<\/p>\n

[26]<\/a> Cf. the commentary for UGU 1:126\u2019.<\/p>\n

[27]<\/a> Steinert suggests \u2308DI\u0160!?<\/sup>–ni\u0161<\/em>!?<\/sup>\u2309, although the traces look like \u2308GAR?<\/sup>–nu<\/em>?<\/sup>\u2309 for which Simko\u2019s reading \u0161a2<\/sub><\/em> \u2308KUR\u2309 \u2308gi\u0161<\/sup>\u2309 (…) is preferred here.<\/p>\n

[28]<\/a> For uzu<\/sup>GI\u0160 as abbreviated form of GE\u0160TU(G) see the comment in Worthington (2005), 29 entry 190.<\/p>\n

[29]<\/a> Reconstruction Scurlock (2014), 441.<\/p>\n

[30]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 13 reads te-ser<\/em> LAGAB A \u201c… rub his skull; r<\/em>[emove<\/em>] all the fluid of his skull …\u201d. However, the reading te-ser-rim<\/em> \u201cyou incise\u201d (usually sar<\/em>\u0101<\/em>mu<\/em>, cf. CAD S, 172 following Labat\u2019s reading) in Scurlock (2014), 441 seems to fit better the context showing a form of trepanation. Despites this, the critique of Worthington regarding this interpretation is still valid (see Worthington (2005), 30).<\/p>\n

[31]<\/a> The correct reconstruction is uncertain. For tu<\/em>-\u0161e-lam-ma<\/em> \u201c(you) remove (all the fluids of his skull)\u201d cf. CAD S. 172 as well as Worthington (2005), 13 and the comment on p. 29f (preferred by Steinert). For tu-bal<\/em> \u201cyou dry up (the fluids of his skull)\u201d see Scurlock (2014), 441 (preferred by Simko). I think there is enough space for CAD\u2019s reconstruction (5 to 6 short signs) but without a parallel nothing can be said with hundred percent certainties.<\/p>\n

[32]<\/a> Suggestion Simko. The parallel construction with GAR-an<\/em> seems to be concerned with the application of oil with a cloth only, whereat other materia medica<\/em> are applied in A iii 62 with MAR.<\/p>\n

[33]<\/a> The case ending for genitive suggests that TUG2<\/sub> should not necessarily be considered as a determinative.<\/p>\n

[34]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 13 and Scurlock (2014), 441 restore the beginning of the line \u2308tu-lap<\/em>\u2309-pat-ma<\/em> but especially the traces before BAD are far from clear to be interpreted as KAL (= lap<\/em>).<\/p>\n

[35]<\/a> Worthington (2005), 21 and Scurlock (2014), 442 interpret the end of the line as whether hot stones or hot coals which have to be arranged around the head. Consider the very odd word order since one would expect NA4<\/sub>.ME\u0160 KUM2<\/sub> \u201chot stones\u201d. According to grammar it might be possible to read \u201c(If …) arrange embers and (the respective healing-) stones around his head\u201d.<\/p>\n

[36]<\/a> Erroneously transcribed as ip<\/em><\/strong>-pe-et-ta-ku-nu-<\/em>\u0161<\/em>i<\/em> in Scurlock (2014), 442.<\/p>\n

[37]<\/a> Cf. for urbatu<\/em>-incantations e.g. Collins (1999), 277ff; Foster (2005), 992 (suggested by U. Steinert).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

iii 96\u2018 Aiii 1 DI\u0160 \u2308KI?\u2309.[MIN[1] \u2026] DE3 \u1e63ar-ba-te ina A GAZIsar SILA11–a\u0161 LAL (ruling) 97\u2018 Aiii 2 \u2308DI\u0160?\u2309 [KI.MIN? \u2026] \u2308\u0161im\u2309GUR2.GUR2 ina A GAZIsar SILA11–a\u0161 LAL (ruling) 98\u2019 Aiii 3 [DI\u0160 KI.MIN? \u2026 ZI3].\u2308KUM\u2309 \u1e2aI.\u1e2aI ina A GAZIsar SILA11–a\u0161 LAL (ruling) 99\u2019 Aiii 4 \u2308DI\u0160?\u2309 [KI.MIN? \u2026] \u2308ZI3.KUM\u2309 \u1e2aI.\u2308HI!\u2309 ina A GAZIsar SILA11–a\u0161 LAL … \u201eBAM 480 preliminary working-transliteration col. iii\u201c<\/span> weiterlesen<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1870,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1870"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":171,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59\/revisions\/171"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.fu-berlin.de\/rereadingbabmed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}